Can someone give me the MLA citation of Frankenstein?

I have misplaced my book and I need the citation for my bibliography. easy 10 points!

I mean the citation of the book itself.

6 Answers

  • You’ll need to know the exact publisher of your book. There are so many different editions of Frankenstein, and your quotations need to reference the right edition. If your essay has no quotations, then you could use any edition of Frankenstein for your bibliography (as shown in the other answer, for example). But if you’ve quoted, you’ll need to find out what edition you were using. Broadview? Penguin? (etc)

    If you’re unsure, it might be helpful to look at the photos of the books shown at amazon.com, or a similar site. If you see a picture of the book you were using, you can figure out the edition by scrolling down to the publication information.

    MLA citation (be sure to follow punctuation exactly): Last name, first name. Title (in italics or underlined). City: Publishing Company, year.

  • Frankenstein Mla Citation

  • Frankenstein Citation

  • This Site Might Help You.

    RE:

    Can someone give me the MLA citation of Frankenstein?

    I have misplaced my book and I need the citation for my bibliography. easy 10 points!

  • I’m not sure if this is what you need or not, but here we go:

    Sources

    Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1987.

    Bloom, Harold, ed. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987.

    Forry, Steven Earl. Hideous Progenies: Dramatizations of Frankenstein from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.

    Kiely, Robert. The Romantic Novel in England. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1972.

    Nichie, Elizabeth. Mary Shelley: Author of Frankenstein. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953.

    Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein or, The Modern Prometheus. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.

    Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein, introduction by Diane Johnson. Bantam Books, 1991.

    Spark, Muriel. Mary Shelley. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1987.

    Summers, Montague. The Gothic Quest. Russell & Russell, 1964.

    Sunstein, Emily W. Mary Shelley: Romance and Reality. Boston: Little Brown & Company, 1989.

    Ty, Eleanor. “Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley.” In Concise Dictionary of British Literary Biography, Volume 3: Writers of the Romantic Period, 1789-1832. Gale, 1991, pp. 338-52.

    Vasbinder, Samuel Holmes. Scientific Attitudes in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1984.

    Walling, William A. Mary Shelley. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1972.

    Further Reading

    Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford University Press, 1987. Treats Frankenstein as a modern myth and examines the effects of the book on later nineteenth-and twentieth-century writers.

    Gilbert, Sandra and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press, 1979. A feminist and psycho-biographical reading which emphasizes the place of books m the novel.

    Goldberg, M. A. “Moral and Myth in Mrs. Shelley’s Frankenstein. In Keats-Shelley Journal, Vol. 8, 1959, pp. 27-38. Provides the most conventional reading of Frankenstein’s tale as a moral lesson to Walton.

    Levine, George. “Frankenstein and the Tradition of Realism.” In Novel, Vol. 7, Fall, 1973, pp. 14-30. Discusses the place of Frankenstein in the tradition of realism in the novel.

    Levine, George and U. C. Knoepflmacher. The Endurance of Frankenstein. University of California Press, 1979. A wide-ranging collection of essays about the novel.

    Mellor, Anne K. Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. Methuen, Inc., 1988. As one of the most well-known Shelley critics, Mellor draws from unpublished archival material, studying the relationships between Mary and the central personalities in her life. Her biography contains a powerful warning to parents who do not care for their children and to scientists who refuse to take responsibility for their discoveries.

    Miyoshi, Masao. The Divided Self: A Perspective on the Literature of the Victorians. New York University Press, 1969, pp. 79-89. Discusses the Doppelganger, or double, in Frankenstein.

    Moers, Ellen. Literary Women, Doubleday, 1976, pp. 91-99. Examines the pain of maternity in Frankenstein, relating the birth of the monster to Shelley’s birth and her experiences as a mother.

    Small, Christopher. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973. A wide-ranging examination of Shelley, her father and husband, the novel, and her era.

    Sunstein, Emily W. Mary Shelley: Romance and Reality. Little, Brown, and Co., 1989. A comprehensive biography which assigns Shelley her proper place among English Romantic writers. She dispels many of the myths and ill-founded prejudices against Shelley.

    Tropp, Martin. Mary Shelley’s Monster. Houghton Mifflin, 1976. A more popular treatment of the novel which emphasizes the “Mad Scientist” theme and treats film adaptations. Includes a filmography.

    Veeder, William. Mary Shelley and Frankenstein: The Fate of Androgyny. University of Chicago Press, 1986. Includes in an appendix Percy Shelley’s unpublished review of the novel.

  • easybib.com & citation machine make the citations for you or you can use

    http://dianahacker.com/writersref5e/

Leave a Comment